COMPLIMENTS
We must compliment
Shri Jayantrao Patil for neither increasing the taxes nor
introducing any new levies on the basic necessities, at least in his speech in
the legislative assembly. We say in his speech because many a times we have
experienced such increase/new levy not finding place in the speech but are
cleverly inserted in the Bill. Hopefully, such back door exercise is not being
done.
If he has introduced this budget after carefully examining
the correctness of the facts and figures submitted by the bureaucracy then in
that case he deserves all compliments. In such circumstances he need not bother
about the criticism from the opposition that the budget lacked the content and
nothing could save it from being dubbed one of the most lacklustre in recent
times.
We say so because we smell bureaucratic play in the figures
of refunds mentioned in the speech. The growth rate of 13 per cent has been
based on such amounts of refunds. It be noted that though the refund payment
orders issued at Rs.1637 crores might have been informed correctly the
legitimate refunds rejected for frivolous reasons also run in crores and will
have to be granted in future. The picture which looks to be rosy today may not
be so tomorrow.
Anyway, the FM has kept the word given in ZP elections and
has refrained from introducing taxes on foodgrains and other basic commodities
at least for next six months. The prices of almost all the basic necessities
have reached to the peak. Such measure should give the normal person with
average income a solace for at least for six months. In our view, the Central
and the State Governments should jointly work for controlling the inflation in
the prices.
As usual the liquor has been targeted. MRP on Indian-made
foreign liquor is now four times the manufacturing cost, if the cost is up to Rs.
92 per litre. We do appreciate the concern regarding the public health and
increase in consumption cost is one such measure to discourage the same. But we
feel, an in-depth study of the factual position is required to be done. Lot of
duplicate foreign liquor is in circulation in the market and the consumption
thereof is more dangerous than the original one. Moreover, such liquor vendors
neither pay any excise duty nor pay the VAT. Country liquor and other spirits
will have the same fate. The cottage industry in these goods is the powerful
sector and the Government can’t reach to them. We feel a second thought be given
to the budget proposals as regards IMFL and Country Liquor.
On the whole the budget proposals have not worsened the
economy so far it relates to the common man. We wish the best of luck to the
Government.
Vinayak Patkar
Editor