|
|
|
|
|
Sales Tax Review |
|
December 2007 |
|
Roving Eye |
-
Roadmap for New Gst is drawn
– Requires filing only one return to tax authorities
As reported in Business
Standard dated 30-11-2007, in a move that will significantly reduce paper work
for producers of goods and services, the draft recommendations submitted by
the all States joint working group on goods and service tax (GST) have said
one document will have to be filed.
-
Businesses and traders currently files
separate returns on State Sales Tax, Central Sales Tax, Central Excise and
Service Tax.
-
The draft recommendations were accepted by the
Empowered Committee of State Finance Ministers, which will be submitted to
the Finance Ministry next month.
-
The GST structure will be finalized by
December 2008 and the rates will also be finalized around that time. Once
implemented from April 1, 2010, India will essentially have three major
taxes – (1) tax on personal and corporate income, (2) GST and (3) property
taxes. The recommendations have modelled the new GST administration on the
Canadian system. Under this system, there will be a Central GST authority
and a State GST authority. Taxpayers will have to file the same GST return
to both the authorities. For administrative convenience, the State authority
will collect both Central and State GST on all goods and pass on the
Centre’s share. Similarly, the Central authority will collect GST on all
services (except primary public health and primary public education) and
pass on the State’s share.
-
Taxpayers will be issued a unique Permanent
Account Number (PAN). Obviously, the present TIN number will stand
cancelled.
-
GST is essentially a value added tax that
requires producers to pay tax only on the value they add to the goods or
service in place of current system in which Central and State imposts
cascade on the price of the final product. However, exports will be
zero-rated and will be relived of all embedded taxes and levies at both the
Central and State levels.
-
State taxes to be merged under GST are value
added tax or sales tax, entertainment tax, luxury tax, octroi, entry tax,
taxes on lotteries, betting, gambling and purchase tax.
-
State entertainment tax will be abolished and
it will come under services under GST.
-
Currently, half-a-dozen states levy purchase
tax on buyers instead of sellers, which cannot be claim as input credit.
This tax will be abolished within a time frame and the tax will be covered
under GST and will be opened to input credit.
-
Timely justice at Re. 1/- per
head every month
The following piece of
information is based on the Times of India Research Report dated 30-11-2007.
-
The Govt. has simply not
focused on how to pull the judiciary out of the mess. Each passing year,
Parliament and State Assemblies pass more and more laws, yet no one in the
Govt. appears to give thought to the obvious – that the number of judges
should be increased to cope with increased number of litigants and that
retraining of judges in new laws should be mandatory.
-
Chief Justice K.G.
Balakrishnan has actually worked out a figure of additional judges that
would be required to clear the judicial backlog. According to him, if 1,539
new judges were added to the existing 792, all pending cases in High Courts
would be cleared in a year. And if they are to be cleared in two years, 770
additional High Court judges would be sufficient.
-
TOI would, however, like
the salaries to be much higher to ensure an efficient and corruption free
judiciary. If worked out a model in which judges would get a respectable
salary and it hiked the number of judges to the level required to clear the
backlog within two years, and found the additional cost would be Rs. 1,426/-
crore. This works out to Re. 1/- per Indian per month – a small price to
ensure quality and timely justice. In addition, the Government has to invest
more in the infrastructure of Courts.
TIMES VIEW
|
Level |
No. of* judges |
Salary
(Rs./month) |
Cost
(Rs. cr/year) |
Additional Cost
(Rs. cr/ year) |
|
Lower Courts |
12,368 |
15,000 |
222.62 |
|
| |
24,638 |
50,000 |
1,478.28 |
1,255.70 |
|
High Courts |
586 |
30,000 |
21.1 |
|
| |
1,562 |
100,000 |
187.44 |
166.3 |
|
Supreme Court |
25 |
33,000 |
0.99 |
|
| |
26 |
150,000 |
4.68 |
3.7 |
|
Chief Justice of India |
1 |
35,000 |
0.04 |
|
| |
1 |
200,000 |
0.24 |
0.2 |
|
Total |
|
|
244.75 |
|
| |
|
|
1,670.64 |
1,425.80 |
Figures in bold indicate the
proposal; the salary figures for each level are rough averages.
* Actual No. of judges, excluding vacancies.
-
The TOI research team has
done a wonderful job as above. If you feel quite impressed about it, please
raise your voice in Government quarters so that we get an efficient judicial
system. Hence, we must act now and without any loss of time.
|
|
|