VAT AUDIT
The latest last date for submission of Form 704 is 30th
April, 2007.
We say latest because we do not know what would be the
developments in next few days. This editorial is being written on 20th April,
2007.
We were in the Court yesterday. On our request, the High
Court had taken up the matter for priority hearing. But to our misfortune, the
Court could not proceed with the hearing. The Court could not even look at the
petition. Only direction their Lordships gave was to keep the matter
continuously on daily board. There are number of other part heard and top
priority matters before the Bench. We are afraid, the Court may not be able to
look to the petition even in the last week of April. In such circumstances what
would be the fate of the petition? Will it become infructuous? No Court shall
permit such thing to happen. The only solution we see, at present, would be the
further extension of last date of submission of audit report. This time it may
be till 30th June, due to vacation.
The further extension of time is going to be fatal for
administration. Their entire schedule has already collapsed. Even after the end
of second year of VAT, they are not in a position to assess the true and correct
results of implementation of VAT. There may be an increase in the revenue. But,
whether the increase is temporary or permanent, they do not know. Further,
whether the increase is from expected quarters or not, they do not know. If they
had undertaken the assessments of the first year of VAT immediately in the next
year, by now they would have been ready with the correct data.
But, who is responsible for such unfortunate situation?
Government of Maharashtra is solely responsible for such maladministration. They
handled this issue of VAT Audit politically. If they did not want to empower the
practising community as a whole to prepare this tax compliance report, they
should have made it clear at the first instance. Till recently, the Finance
Minister and the Commissioner, both, kept on saying that the issue was under
consideration. We remember, in one meeting, the Commissioner in the presence of
the Finance Minister declared that the VAT Audit is nothing but the outsourcing
of assessments and he would rather prefer to give it to all provided those
persons are in practice for minimum seven years. But, thereafter, the Finance
Minister, informed us that the Commissioner was against giving such
assessments/tax compliance to the persons other than Chartered Accountants and
therefore he was helpless in the matter. We do not know the truth nor are we now
interested to know it, but, had this decision been taken earlier there would not
have been so much delay in filing Writ Petition and the difficulties which the
administration is now facing could have been avoided.
We suggest that audit for the year 2005-06 be now made
optional. The assessments for that year be taken up immediately by making
necessary amendments in law. It will also give proper idea of VAT implementation
to the Revenue.
Vinayak Patkar
Editor