Home | Contact Us | Disclaimer | Sitemap 

STPAM Logo

Sales Tax Practioners' Association of Maharashtra

"The main object of our Association is to educate the public in general and the members in particulars on Sales Tax and Allied Laws in the State of Maharashtra, India".

Membership Forms | STR Subscription Forms

DDQ’s | Tax Digest | Allied Tax Laws | Articles | From the Courts | Downloads

Sales Tax Review

January  2007

Important Trade Circulars

No.VAT-2007/ACT/Adm-13/PSI/R.Audit/B-
 

Circular  No. 3T of  2007

Mumbai, dt: 10.01.2007

   
Sub:  Refund Audit under MVAT Act. 
Ref: Scope and procedure to be followed.

Gentlemen /Sir /Madam,

BACKGROUND 

           The Maharashtra State has adopted the progressive system of VAT in place of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, with effect from 01.04.2005.  It may be appreciated that the success of VAT system lies in the level of self compliance by a dealer who is liable for registration under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred as “the MVAT Act”).  The practice of annual assessment followed under the B.S.T. Act is done away with.  Under MVAT Act, the returns filed by a dealer are accepted as true and correct. In the event of some contrary facts coming to the notice of the Department, then only passing of assessment orders u/s. 23 of the MVAT Act, is to be taken recourse to.  A return filed under MVAT Act, by a dealer, may result either in payment of tax on the value addition or in a claim of refund out of the taxes paid on purchases by particular dealer.  Claim of such refund is allowable subject to the provisions of Section 48 and 50 of the MVAT Act, 2002.  On submission of claim by a dealer in prescribed Form 501, provisional refund is to be issued as per Section 51 of MVAT Act to such claimant dealer equal to pre-determined percentage of total refund as per returns.  The balance due refund is released after audit of the claim is completed and also on satisfaction of the prescribed conditions for grant of refund.  With these objectives in mind, the Sales Tax Department has carved out two separate Audit Branches namely:- (i) Business Audit Branch and (ii) Refund Audit Branch.  The purpose of the Refund Audit Branch is to audit claims of refund filed by the dealers in respect of the period covered by a return in Form 501, as stated above.

 

  1. Various representations and queries have been received by this office, seeking clarifications regarding scope, procedure, purpose of refund audit, powers of the auditors and consequences of the defaults.  Queries have also been raised as to the nature of the record to be produced before auditor in the course of audit process.
     

  2. In order to remove any doubts to the above queries, various aspects of the refund audit are hereby clarified for the guidance of trade as well as Departmental Audit Officers as under:

  1. POWER TO AUDIT :-

Section 22 of the MVAT Act, 2002 , confers authority to conduct Audit. (Sub-sections 1(b), 3 and 5 of section 22 of the MVAT Act).  As per sub-section 5 of Section 22 of the MVAT Act, a dealer should afford necessary facilities to inspect his books of accounts and related records to enable the auditor/s to carry out audit effectively.  As per Section 23 of the MVAT Act,  required powers are delegated, to assess the dealer, if refund claimed or granted is in excess of admissible refund and such findings by the auditor are not acceptable to the dealer.

RESTRICTIONS ON AUDIT OFFICER :-

 

Sub-section 5(b) lays down the following restrictions on the audit officer :

The officer conducting the audit shall on no account remove or cause to be removed any books of accounts, other documents or any cash or stock.

  1. THE SCOPE OF REFUND AUDIT.

As stated above, main purpose of the refund audit is to verify the authenticity and the correctness of the refund claim with reference to the returns furnished and the books of accounts maintained.  Such audit may result either in confirmation of the refund claim or variation therein.  In case of the second possibility, appropriate corrective actions will be initiated by the auditor.  If dealer accepts the auditor’s findings, then he may file revised return or may submit acceptance letter or may sign the proceeding sheet to that effect.  If the dealer does not accept the auditor’s findings, then the auditor will issue show cause notice in Form 302 to proceed to assess the dealer.

 

During the course of verification of the claim of refund, the audit officer will go through the purchase record on the basis of which the claimant dealer has claimed refund of the tax paid on his purchases.  The details of purchases will be obtained by the auditor to verify with the records of the vendors of the claimant dealer.  In the course of audit,  the audit officer will check the correctness of the tax liability on sales effected by the claimant dealer and/or that disclosed in the returns.  After verification of the transactions of the purchases with the record of the vendor, if it comes to the notice that VAT collected by the vendor has not been paid into Government Treasury, in spite of being liable to pay tax, then claim of refund to the extent of such tax, is liable to be disallowed as provided under section 48 of MVAT Act, 2002.

  1. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CLAIMANT DEALER:

After receipt of the application in Form 501 as prescribed under sub-rule (1) of Rule 60 of the MVAT Rules, 2005, the audit officer would call the claimant dealer, to fix a date which is mutually convenient for visiting the place of business for the purpose of audit.   Auditor will communicate in advance the details of the dealer's records, documents and statements, etc. which will be verified during the course of the audit.  The appointed date would be fixed looking into the convenience of the dealer as far as practicable.  On the date of visit, the dealer should facilitate verification of various claims including sales against declarations, exports, etc., which may affect the tax liability and refund amount.  The dealer is required to furnish self-certified copies, extracts and details of documents as may be asked for by the Audit officer.

 

Failure to comply with the requirements for audit of refund claim may result in following consequences:-

  1. assessment proceedings may be initiated, in which case refund will be processed through assessment proceedings and not under section 51 of the MVAT Act, 2002.
     

  2. initiation of penal proceedings for non compliance of statutory requirements under the MVAT Act.

  1. CROSS CHECK OF TRANSACTIONS: Cross check is a vital activity to ensure that the tax being claimed as input tax credit pertain to the transactions which are duly accounted for and the tax has been paid into Govt. Treasury. The job of cross verification of particular transactions and proof of payment of collected tax will be carried out for the present, through visits to the place of business of the vendor by the duly authorised Sales Tax Inspectors. Sales Tax Inspectors will visit the places of business of suppliers on the date as far as possible fixed in consultation with the concerned supplier. The supplier should facilitate such cross check exercise and make available the required registers and copies of the returns, challan, etc.

Failure to comply with the requirements for audit of refund claim may result in non processing of refund claims and/or initiation of penal proceedings for non compliance of statutory requirements under the MVAT Act

  1. Declarations prescribed under Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.

Normally, the claimant dealer should be in effective possession of the various declarations on the basis of which he has claimed either exemption from payment of CST or payment at reduced rate.   However, it is noticed that when the audit officer visits the place of business of such dealers, the claimant dealers are unable to produce the requisite declarations fully.  In such cases, refund will be withheld to the extent of missing declarations considering maximum rate of tax on such missing declarations. On production of missing declarations, assessee will get the corresponding refund claim or if he fails to produce the missing declarations, assessment order under CST Act, 1956 will be passed accordingly. It is needless to say that such order will be appealable u/s. 26 of MVAT, 2002, read with section 9(2) of the CST Act, 1956.

  1. This Circular is clarificatory in nature. If any person has any doubt, he may refer the matter to this office for clarification.
     

  2. You are requested to bring the contents of this Circular to the notice of the members of your Association.

(B. C. KHATUA)

Commissioner of Sales Tax

Maharashtra State, Mumbai.

All rights reserved. Copyright STPAM.
Best viewed at 800*600 using IE 4.0+.
Site designed by Finesse InfoTech